InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,214.08
(
0.51%
)
US TECH 100
17,658.00
(
0.32%
)
Dow Jones
39,387.76
(
0.85%
)
Brent Oil
84.29
(
0.40%
)
Bitcoin
63,267.21
(
0.35%
)
Post# of 51701
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

iSmellCrickets

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 56
Posts 2257
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/04/2014

iSmellCrickets

Re: jjwood post# 43999

Wednesday, 06/01/2016 11:12:54 AM

Wednesday, June 01, 2016 11:12:54 AM

Post# of 51701
Very simple explanation

As Kevin could easily be headed toward acquiring tangible assets. No other reason I can see for such loan terms. They have very little time left this year to pay the loan back, or be liquidated.

Not to mention the tax write off in so many ways I can't imagine. Then allowing said assets to be claimed as part of the patent suit GERS will lose upon appeal, if even taken up.

As noticed by everyone else, shareholders are of no concern in this matter. None. Just a means to stay 'legit' within the regulations by public offerings.

Disclaimer: Everything I post is opinion and is not to be taken as investment advice. You make your own decisions based on your own judgement. Do your own DD = 'Due Diligence' = Your trade, Your responsibility.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up