Thanks for your reply. I just feel that the original holders gave up their right to litigate for compensation re them....which translates to cancellation of their LTW's in my eyes. In that case 85% of the proceeds would be divided amongst the remaining LTW's. I don't think that JPM became their owner...all just my opinion. I do think that the cancelled LTW holders may have a case against JPM if they can prove they were hoodwinked in some manner. But, that's a different matter.
I am sorry for my double post...and to Linda who I hope didn't think my post was directed towards her. She has been the best!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
