Thanks for your reply. I just feel that the original holders gave up their right to litigate for compensation re them....which translates to cancellation of their LTW's in my eyes. In that case 85% of the proceeds would be divided amongst the remaining LTW's. I don't think that JPM became their owner...all just my opinion. I do think that the cancelled LTW holders may have a case against JPM if they can prove they were hoodwinked in some manner. But, that's a different matter.
I am sorry for my double post...and to Linda who I hope didn't think my post was directed towards her. She has been the best!
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.