OK so is this all good or bad for these symbols, any reinstatement and sale of shell for RM has to be good eh?
Not necessarily. If you go to the bottom of nodummy's post, you'll see that several of Tracy's shells are already worthless.
Others, like BILB, may be problematic because the shells have significant liabilities. It doesn't seem Tracy did much DD, if any, when he chose to bring custodianship actions. Of course, he has no way of knowing when the SEC might decide to revoke registration of any dormant company that's still an SEC registrant.
Part of the problem with his lists--I know of only two, both from April, but it seems you can sign up for more at the Barton Hollow site--is that he doesn't yet control all of the companies advertised. Obviously he can't sell any of those to prospective buyers until he's named custodian and has taken other steps to put himself in charge. So it wouldn't be smart for traders to make speculative plays in those.
And once he does gain control, he has to find a buyer. That could take awhile. To offer an example involving a different shell salesman, Bryan Glass got custodianship of the Amarium Technologies (AMMG) shell in early 2009, but didn't find a buyer until mid-2012.
Even pristine shells don't always sell. Back in the late 90s and early 2000s, Tony DeMint registered a fairly large number of new shells with the SEC. They were absolutely new, never been used. They were also blank checks, but at the time that wasn't a problem. Even so, I don't think he sold more than half. That may have been in part because he gave some of them funny names, like "Nothing Corp", and "Too Late Financials Inc"...