InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Doktornolittle

05/20/16 4:12 PM

#62470 RE: PacificNW #62461

Thanks Afford, but I do find the big $ side of things worrisome. I too think that demonstrated efficacy will take care of a lot of pot-holes or at least make them moot... but I don't know what to think of the big $ issues that Pyrrho points at.

One thing I noticed is that Pyrrho quotes R&D expenditures and divides by batches of DCVax-L to infer per batch cost. Nothing in there for automated mfg development. Such has been completed for Direct, and that had to cost a lot of money. If such is ongoing for L, which is much more difficult, that too has to be very expensive.... but expensive enough to account for the big $ in question? I'm not sure. It is a loooooot of money. Automated mfg is incredibly expensive... but is it that expensive? Not sure.

If not, maybe we get a chunk of Cognate when all is said and done? Nobody seems to think so. Best prognosis is just many shares of NWBO returned from Cognate. But as you say, that would be pretty good too.
icon url

Dan_P

05/21/16 11:19 AM

#62514 RE: PacificNW #62461

Won't the NASDAQ assertion of improperly financing Cognate open a channel for massive lawsuits? How will they come up with the multi-millions to cover that?

What about the Malik under the table payoff claim? If LP is indicted how will that play out?