Replies to post #117154 on Paychest Inc (PYCT)

[jlwcat1]

Yes, if shorts were smart, they would cover now. However, they will not cover until they are forced to. That is how they run. When the MMs and brokers are given only so many new shares due to the name and cusip change, a major math problem will arise. Then the fireworks begin. A dividend will fuel it even more.

Tick tock!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[lemon]

The theory presented to the board over these many years suggest shorts do not need to cover since there was never a real threat to Paychest share price moving up.

IMO, of course, the only way to really prove a huge short exist would be up to someone at Paychest presenting some very verifiable statements of current activities. That hasn't happen in over 10 years.

The short theory on Paychest shares has been an ongoing activity on this board for many years. Most are used to it and try to ignore it. Some, however get real excited and continually show prove there is no short.

Perhaps what will be, will some day be. Most likely however, it will never be, IMO