So the issue is not the information it contains. The issue is what instrument was used to disclose that information
No, the information that it contains also violates professional standards. It uses historical information to extrapolate resource estimates and costs that is not permitted by either NI 43-101 or Industry Guide 7.
The report would not be compliant in either the US or Canada, even if he did not fraudulently label it an "NI 43-101 report".