Replies to post #43849 on Impact Fusion International Inc (IFUS)

[PEACHMAN]

It turns out the facts reviewed by the state judge shows there are issues of material facts in dispute and the affirmative defenses preclude summary judgement.

https://www.clerk-17th-flcourts.org/Web2/CaseSearch/

HIT BUSINESS NAME TYPE IN SUPREME ENERGY

https://www.clerk-17th-flcourts.org/Web2/CaseSearch/Details/?caseid=Njk4MjY0Mw%3d%3d-Cb4KJLWhz88%3d&caseNum=CACE13015311&category=CV

Motion by boot brothers denied...THE STATE JUDGE CLEARLY STATES EVIDENCE IS AVAILABLE AND THE MOTION BY BOOT BROTHERS DENIED.

ANOTHER VICTORY FOR IFUS

[PEACHMAN]

For three years SA has said,there is no evidence... It turns out the state judge strongly disagrees.

The boot brothers were denied their motion at the state level.

Another victory for IFUS and it's shareholders...The trail left by a drunk like JOE will now show how the actions of the boot brothers prevented Supreme Energy from making the payment on time...

Tortious interference evidence at the state level will most likely be followed up with criminal charges against the boot brothers unless they settle to avoid jail time.

[Celtics2011]

Thank you again for bringing this to my attention its extremely helpful in making my decision. I appreciate you looking out for everyone truly unselfish of you.