But that poster who has been here 2+ years (like that matters in any way, what you think only new ones distort things) put out there his conversation with Les and the $50M in the bank, pretty critical and important facts if true and then split for the weekend not even checking his work. Then 2 days later comes back and says opps he didn't mean to say $50M even though he proved that it was by calculating it when he first wrote it. Now if that isn't intent of some sort I don't know what is, after all he was basically quoting Les the first time. How do yu quote someone and then unquote someone just because other members not privy to the personal cnversation prove he is wrong in his calls. Kind of says he tried to spread something in my book that may not be entirely factual to get his own agenda across. That and the fact that Les is a seasoned attorney who knows the game better than anyone here of what he can and cannot say privately or publicly. you think Les is going to risk his skin for anyone here?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
