Replies to post #19431 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[Mcfish]

WOW!!

[prototype_101]

Thanks Steve! Based on your discussions with Steve, it looks like my original interpretation of the pr may have been correct, so perhaps for once we are actually progressing ahead of schedule, and if that is true then

BOOYAH BABY!

[prototype_101]

Optical loss was of no meaning because of the shortage of the waveguide. It's of no relevance in this type of device.

Steve, just to clarify, what you are saying is that the optical loss is not an issue with our proto, or in other words the optical loss was indeed at a commercially viable/acceptable level, correct?

What confuses me is when you say "It's of no relevance in this type of device." because in my mind the optical loss is relevant in all of these types of devices, so I assume you meant it is irrelevant because it is acceptably low, is this a correct interpretation?

[WisePolicalEconomist]

SteveSchiets,

From your lips to God's Ears !!!

I greatly appreciate your update, not that I understand the science and engineering of the RWM, but it certainly comes across as fantastic news.

Cautionly I say the biggest hurtles are behind us and it now comes down to fine tune the device and pack it. Present it to the big boys and open your eyes in disbelief when this stock surges multiple dollars on each trading session in 2017.

Assuming you are correct about the biggest hurdles being behind LWLG, have you any thoughts why volume and share price have not materially reacted to the news. LWLG has clearly spread the news to the powers that be and the investment community. That LWLG remains the best-kept secret in this niche is more than perplexing.

Thanks again,
-WISEGUY