InvestorsHub Logo

PacificNW

04/19/16 2:12 AM

#59267 RE: chinatown1980 #59261

It sure seems that way to me too. It would make total sense that Doc was affiliated with NWBO and is trying to spin this in NWBO's favor by getting the shareholders ready for an imminent dilution and at the same time attempting to spin the dilution as protective to LP i.e. and thus positive for shareholders. Even though any dummy can see that it wouldn't be and that LP has her self insulated with multiple lines of protection while leaving shareholders out in the cold imho. For doc to come on here and write this stuff is just so blatantly ballsy it makes my head spin. What a bunch of hogwash. and to top it off saying that NW will join the conspiracy for his benefit to......wow. If NWBO doesn't have their ducks in a row now they never will, they already have blown thru an amount pretty close to what that new Immunotherapy fund that was recently announced amounts to. I am very bummed reading Doc's nonsense.

DoGood_DoWell

04/19/16 7:47 AM

#59270 RE: chinatown1980 #59261

Are you affiliated with Pyrrhonian?

Doc logic

04/19/16 10:50 AM

#59279 RE: chinatown1980 #59261

chinatown1980,

First of all, anyone who has read my posts for any length of time knows I call it as I see it. Secondly, both you austinmediainc and now others think that I might be working for NWBO. As I have told austinmediainc and others, I have no affiliation, directly or indirectly, with NWBO, it's management, affiliates, employees of same or relatives or friends of relatives of same to the best of my knowledge. The fact that both you and austinmediainc as well as others have asked me this makes me chuckle and think that this is what being balanced is all about.

As to your question about ownership, let me just say that warrants take money to convert to voting shares. Right now that is money that NWBO does not have that much of. My understanding is that they will make the money they do have stretch as far as they can unless any given situation creates a need to dilute again to maintain control of the company. Most construction contracts require at least 50% down and milestone payments on the way to completion. I assume this is the case here as well. If you have proof of something different please advise. Best wishes.