InvestorsHub Logo

SquealingSquid

04/14/16 9:19 AM

#59175 RE: bas2020 #59174

I've been wondering that myself, I think they should've applied for ODD in Rett's with 2-73

hessmessinc

04/14/16 9:21 AM

#59176 RE: bas2020 #59174

I understand your question in that you are asking why not get ODD for 2-73 in Front DM along with 3-71. Personally, with it being a small biotech, I wouldn't want to see it start stretching itself too thin. They should be focusing on the big money makers (like Alzheimer's).

Could it be done, sure. But I think major investors would be happier with separate focuses right now. I would also imagine that the approval process for 2-73 would be faster to get through after approval in Alzheimer's.

This is my uneducated opinion, but as an investor, let us focus on getting 2-73 approved so we can start making some revenues...

hessmessinc

04/14/16 9:23 AM

#59178 RE: bas2020 #59174

This may also be a reason: "However, only the first drug to be approved for a given indication will enjoy the benefits of orphan approval."

http://pharmaceuticalcommerce.com/opinion/common-misconceptions-about-the-orphan-drug-designation/