So how do you explain that deal. Either they thought they were on the verge of monetizing the patents and a few months would be no problem or to go with your theory they would never have monetized them so then why would the company accept that financing arrangement? I want to know why they agreed to those financing terms. If you think that's bogus than that is your right. I still want to know how I as an investor lost my share of those patents right at the end.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
