InvestorsHub Logo

DOLPHY

04/02/16 7:10 PM

#58081 RE: blu_1 #58078

If 3 71 is better, why are they wasting time on furthering trials on 2 73?
I am not sure what is going on. I invested because of the great hopes for 2 73. Is it not strange that a company comes up with a great product but before it is approved that same company claims to have another great product to surpass their first discovery? I am still confused. It is looking like the news is too good to be true.

blu_1

04/02/16 9:17 PM

#58086 RE: blu_1 #58078

When did they acquire the license for 3-71? 2-73 was further in development than 3-71 and they acquired it earliar.