Thanks for your commentary, Jack. A lot more should be going on now than a decade ago. A seemingly flawless product has been built. Shareholders have something tangible to view. The inexperience of dealing with testing, marketing and regulatory issues is half the battle here. The other half of the battle is management and majority shareholder unwillingness to enact positive changes that would save thousands of lives and put dollars into the pockets of those same shareholders. Where's the logic? Maybe.....just maybe....some of the majority shareholders have scratched their collective heads enough times to realize that things aren't right. It's not all about the EPA. There's a whole planet out there, and a good portion of it doesn't care about the EPA. Other U.S. companies have proven that premise. Having a shareholder meeting might be in the cards anyway, because existing shares are dwindling down and PPLs are not the rage anymore.