Replies to post #24487 on Bourque Industries Inc (BORK)

[kbbccandyman]

Hey... it is a simple question. No right minded person would committ to this kind of a transaction unless there were other terms
that would provide an additional benefit to Thomas Hansen


"Why would Thomas Hansen provide BORK an asset worth $176,000 per year for a pittance of only $6,000 per year?????????"

Come on JB spill the rest of the story. Are you expecting us to believe this is the totality of the transaction relative to the lease of the 8,000 SF building. Seriously!!!! Only $500 per month
which works out to only 6.5 cents per SF per month when the average lease rates in the area are averaging $1.83 per SF per month or
$14,600.$1.83 per SF per month.

That's $500 per month total for a property that normally would lease for $14,600 per month.


JB ... you tweeted this was an up front deal. And if you think
"your" shareholders are to believe that is the totality of the transaction between yourself and Thomas Hansen relative to the lease agreement of his 8,000 SF building. Then you are losing credibility and you must think your hurting in the dark shareholders are dumb as dirt.

Does any one here really think this is the whole story??????

Common sense folks. I know you want to be hopeful that you will be able to recover some of your 100% lost investment dollars, but my gut tells me we are being lied to cheated and treated like dirt.

[gotmilk]

Canyman, I'm in the same boat as you and all Hurting in the Dark Shareholders that have not visited Bourque Industries Headquarters & Lab and obtained that "feel good" experience, which seems to be truthful as towards a soon (coming months in this year 2016 to arrive ?) whereupon Bourque Industries will along with other companies disclose to the public a beginning of Kryron alloys to be incorporated into end products. Its expected of a possibility that Bourque Industries will absorb or partner with selected companies currently engaged with manufacturing alloys either as raw material for others companies, or with the ability to manufacture alloys and directly produce their own end products such as wire or armor.

Question: "Why would Thomas Hansen provide BORK an asset worth $176,000 per year for a pittance of only $6,000 per year?"

Thomas Hansen's Biomechanics R&D http://www.biomechrd.com/Contact.html (480)-889-3218 "Has been disconnected."

I agree, its stuff like this that causes one to question if the "dealings" Bourque Industries Board of Directors have taken (undisclosed to the shareholders) will become known to protect all shareholders or just John Bourque & Crew (Officers and Insiders) once these "most likely" legal (needed to be done to keep Bourque Industries afloat and viable) but not made public so as to prevent any concerned Hurting in the Dark Shareholders to initiate legal action to question if the officers at Bourque Industries engineered events to cause such actions while other options available since 2011 were not taken knowing that John Bourque & Crew (Officers and Insiders) would lose control of Bourque Industries operations. Once again I"ll speculate with a high degree of certainty that all those years John Bourque spent in prison John Bourque removed from Bourque Industries the companies proprietary knowledge of how to make Kryron alloys with intent to prevent company officers at Bourque Industries from engaging person's with technical skills in the material sciences of alloys such that John Bourque's help was not needed, releasing John Bourque from position of Senior Scientist. So here, if the above is accurate and can be shown as facts, we can postulate to provide a basis for logical reasoning that since 2011 to current time, activity conducted by the Officers at Bourque Industries are done not in the interest of all shareholders, but in the interest of John Bourque & Crew (Officers and Insiders) to retain control of Bourque Industries such that the future control of Bourque Industries, and the wealth obtained by Kryron sales, will be distributed to John Bourque & Crew (Officers and Insiders) in amounts much greater than if Bourque Industries was executed since 2011 if John Bourque did not conceal and remove from Bourque Industries it's Kryron proprietary knowledge.

So here I'm suggestion that no "side deals" in the context of being illegal have been conducted at Bourque Industries since John Bourque's return, but all concerns of the Candyman are valid in so much that while Bourque Industries by-law need not disclose shit to the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders, that eventually activity by the Officers at Bourque Industries since 2011 to current date, with emphasis focused on the time period since John Bourque's return, will become known such that the covers over current shit will be remove causing certain Hurting in the Dark Shareholders to consider the option of an investigation to be conducted in strength based on the strength of what they consider unfair destruction of their investment into Bourque Industries.

The posts contained on my (gotmilk) account are my own opinions and are not recommendations or advise to buy or sell any security, stocks or other investments. These posts are for entertainment purposes only and are not considered to be facts or truth.