InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 647
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/22/2011

Re: kbbccandyman post# 24487

Saturday, 03/26/2016 5:31:25 PM

Saturday, March 26, 2016 5:31:25 PM

Post# of 28680
Hey... it is a simple question. No right minded person would committ to this kind of a transaction unless there were other terms
that would provide an additional benefit to Thomas Hansen


"Why would Thomas Hansen provide BORK an asset worth $176,000 per year for a pittance of only $6,000 per year?????????"

Come on JB spill the rest of the story. Are you expecting us to believe this is the totality of the transaction relative to the lease of the 8,000 SF building. Seriously!!!! Only $500 per month
which works out to only 6.5 cents per SF per month when the average lease rates in the area are averaging $1.83 per SF per month or
$14,600.$1.83 per SF per month.

That's $500 per month total for a property that normally would lease for $14,600 per month.


JB ... you tweeted this was an up front deal. And if you think
"your" shareholders are to believe that is the totality of the transaction between yourself and Thomas Hansen relative to the lease agreement of his 8,000 SF building. Then you are losing credibility and you must think your hurting in the dark shareholders are dumb as dirt.

Does any one here really think this is the whole story??????

Common sense folks. I know you want to be hopeful that you will be able to recover some of your 100% lost investment dollars, but my gut tells me we are being lied to cheated and treated like dirt.