I see what you are saying, and it is a logical possibility if we assume the text is real. However, let's also think of other logical interpretations because there are no absolutes. I have one, but would like to see others' viewpoints first.
Well, he did refute owning, selling, or shorting DIDG in his Twitter feed. Many just pick and choose what they want to acknowledge just to continue the drama. Also, he stated he has never done anything to violate securities laws.
That's exactly what I'm saying, it's an interpretation in retrospect of what it could mean. We didn't even see the whole discussion, it could mean something completely different when we see the discussion thread.
In fact he did. Look at this:
I have no long or short position in $DIDG. I've never shorted $DIDG & wish all investors well.
— Ryan Schadel - CEO of $MVCO (@CRyanSchadel) March 19, 2016
and this:
@FIGZ415 @10baggersallday like I said. I have no position or economic interest at all in $DIDG and wish the best for all investors
— Ryan Schadel - CEO of $MVCO (@CRyanSchadel) March 19, 2016
and this:
@otcanalyzed not me. I assure you the SEC will have no issue with any actions I've ever taken.
— Ryan Schadel - CEO of $MVCO (@CRyanSchadel) March 19, 2016
Is shorting a stock is something to be accused of to start with? Even if he actually did it and with bad intention, was the action itself done out of the legal framework or against rules and regulation? My understanding is no.
HE HAS DENIED IT ON TWITTER AND I'VE TOLD YOU BUT YOU KEEP POSTING HE HAS NOT. SO WITH ME TELLING YOU THIS AND YOU KEEP POSTING SHOWS HOW DESPERATE YOU REALLY ARE.