InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Weby

07/19/06 9:42 AM

#125936 RE: barge #125933

Barge
As I get closer and closer to voting my shares I have to agree with you last point. While I wish they had made their purpose clearer -- we used to speak of a secondary IPO. If the two parts rs and as had been properly explained and voted on separately, I'd be happier.

On the other hand, if these shares are used to raise money in a secondary offering and improve the publics participation and the share price, or get used to buy other parts in a 3rd phase plan, I won't be left unhappy. As always, it comes down to do you trust management with your money. Thus far, nobody is happy because we are at half a buck. Comes the revolution and a couple of splits -- this becomes a memory of survival.
icon url

kantbleveit

07/19/06 11:23 AM

#125952 RE: barge #125933

barge,,,my concern is.. the spragues are using the resources and devoutness of the voids to fill the timing gap that they ran into regarding advent of tpm's.

i brought up williams telecommunications 18 months or 2 years ago,,,,the original shareholders got screwed,, about 4 months after the CEO pledged it "WOULD NOT HAPPEN."

WILTEL survived, but only the 2nd round of investors, after the revamping, were rewarded.

THAT is MY concern at this juncture.

Yes, the agreements and playing field is so so so so much better then in 2000......and the stock was $50 higher.....i'll borrow anothers handle and say "GO FIGURE".

in reality, i still say that i
kantbleveit