Replies to post #35475 on Carnegie Development Inc. (CDJM)

[stockfan100]

That is why without even a single PR from ESCU, the original PPS (after R/S) of $2 is now $3.50! Almost DOUBLE THE R/S PPS!

GO ESCU!

ESCU 4th Quarter 2015

https://www.otciq.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=151323

PAGE 18…Simply Captivating!

The CEO of Kerry Capital that assessed ESCU’s $40,000,000 asset is a MBA Harvard Graduate and has over 25 years of experience in the field!

KERRY Capital firm used multiple methods of assessment to determine ESCU’s asset is worth $40,000,000!

[Milesblue42]

BigBuy57, isn't this how PUMP-n-DUMP Schemes operate?

The Escue Energy Information below doesn't make any sense because the share structure was reduced in 2011 after the 4th Reverse Split?

ESCU elected to reverse the stock 2,000:1 for a reason. They wanted a very tight stock, which is what they got and exactly what they have now.

Why didn't the new Team buyback shares then?
How many times have Investors heard this silliness since 2002?
Wasn't the stock tight in 2011?

Security Notes

Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 10 split. Effective date=4-3-02
Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 200 split. Pay date=5-18-05
Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 2000 split Pay date=09/04/2007.
Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 1000 split Pay date=10/27/2011.
Capital Change=shs decreased by 1 for 2000 split. Pay date=06/23/2015.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ESCU/profile

The tight float will be worth it's weight in gold when ESCU starts making its first series of announcements.

So does a tight float after a 5th REVERSE SPLIT make this a PUMP and DUMP?