Replies to post #54949 on Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[JB3729]

If you're disappointed by that, then beef about the Company's legal team. You can bet that Dr. Missling sought advise on the subpoena disclosure.

[circa1762]

I agree you are good at finding fault, because you are really reaching for it here. If the worst thing this CEO ever does is not to issue a red-alert, all-hands-on-deck PR about a subpoena that isn't pursuant to any case being brought against the company itself, I call that good. The company has already stated that it believes the one lawsuit actually filed has no merit.

[TrueTrades]

If the subpoena had anything to do with impropriety by the co or officers, and the CEO felt he needed to cover his butt, then maybe yes, you would see some fluffy PRs. The subpoena is not material to the company's endeavors, do you get it? It's like there was a horsefly biting you and the other campers got mad because you didn't tell them about it, instead of continuing to cook the great BBQ they were about to have. Sheesh!....kabob! ;-)
§