Replies to post #34944 on Carnegie Development Inc. (CDJM)

[FD2you]

Submission to the SEC is a submission to the public, since the S-1 is available freely to the public.

Approval is simply a formality. IF they can get approved, it will be one step in the right direction, but NOT proof of anything.

Remember, Kimmons had an S-1 approved once and all that pathetic POS ever did was use it as a tool to bilk investors out of more cash.

[Milesblue42]

BigBuy57, The SEC has questions about ESCU/Gary's #'s??

The S1 has been presented to the SEC for approval. It has not been released to the public as "approved" by the SEC. As such, it has not been presented for public consideration.

ESCU submitted there S-1 on October 23rd 2015

The United States Securites Exchange Commision sent it back because it has questions....on October 28th 2015

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=11055219 Page ii

Explanatory Note: In response to the Commission's letter of October 28, 2015, this Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (Amendment No. 1) is being filed to provide currently dated Auditors' Reports for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014. In addition, a currently dated Exhibit 23.1, Consent of Auditors, is attached as Exhibit 23.1. The Company's Auditor, East West Accounting Services, LLC, is now PCAOB qualified, thus necessitating that the currently dated items described hereinabove are included in this Form S-1/A (Amendment No.1).

Hey wait a minute....2012? Wasn't Gary F Kimmons with this company in 2013?

So technically does the United States Securities Exchange commission have a question about Gary F Kimmons? Hopefully he is running his mouth and reaching to the SEC like he did when he doing his eDoorways blog Ha Ha