It brings up several points already made on this board.
It's also an extremely biased piece that offers no attempt at providing an answer outside of one conclusion: Pump and Dump.
It provides no mention of the PATT app references.
It completely misrepresents the 1.2 billion dollars (of which the necessity of an 8-k has been debated here).
The article comes out before the deadline for an 8-k related to the acquisition has come and gone, and that's even if it's legally required at this point.
The dilution point is valid; however, how toxic it is remains a matter of perspective. It's not that toxic if it keeps the company in play long enough to generate its own revenue. At some point they'll likely R/S if they want to uplist, but that R/S will be tolerable if the company's financials recover.
I'm not saying DNRG doesn't have some red flags, but that was a smear job.