InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Neophius

02/18/16 12:32 PM

#26849 RE: inspector joe #26848

It brings up several points already made on this board.

It's also an extremely biased piece that offers no attempt at providing an answer outside of one conclusion: Pump and Dump.

It provides no mention of the PATT app references.

It completely misrepresents the 1.2 billion dollars (of which the necessity of an 8-k has been debated here).

The article comes out before the deadline for an 8-k related to the acquisition has come and gone, and that's even if it's legally required at this point.

The dilution point is valid; however, how toxic it is remains a matter of perspective. It's not that toxic if it keeps the company in play long enough to generate its own revenue. At some point they'll likely R/S if they want to uplist, but that R/S will be tolerable if the company's financials recover.

I'm not saying DNRG doesn't have some red flags, but that was a smear job.
icon url

otcwhiz

02/18/16 12:42 PM

#26853 RE: inspector joe #26848

Hotstocked is known for bashing penny stocks and most of the time end of with "Let the buyer beware". they usually have their own agenda.....
Nothing is this article in the new.
What they typically do is look cash ,current assets ,current liabilities, revenue ,profit if loss.
They don't take into consideration anything else.
icon url

The Rainmaker

02/18/16 1:25 PM

#26856 RE: inspector joe #26848

Definitely looks like a Highly qualified Wall Street Analyst who wrote that article...lol Looks like he is 15 years old.