It brings up several points already made on this board.
It's also an extremely biased piece that offers no attempt at providing an answer outside of one conclusion: Pump and Dump.
It provides no mention of the PATT app references.
It completely misrepresents the 1.2 billion dollars (of which the necessity of an 8-k has been debated here).
The article comes out before the deadline for an 8-k related to the acquisition has come and gone, and that's even if it's legally required at this point.
The dilution point is valid; however, how toxic it is remains a matter of perspective. It's not that toxic if it keeps the company in play long enough to generate its own revenue. At some point they'll likely R/S if they want to uplist, but that R/S will be tolerable if the company's financials recover.
I'm not saying DNRG doesn't have some red flags, but that was a smear job.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.