Replies to post #117691 on NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[Nanotoday]

Please thread my post. Claiming they have not begun the process of demonstrating its success in humans is silly.
Would you prefer they have so far been unable to demonstrate success in humans? How about they have not succeeded in demonstrating success in humans? How about they have yet to successfully complete the act of demonstrating success in humans?

Bottom line, to date, they have failed to demonstrate success in humans.

[JG36]

So you must believe either:

(1) That NNVC has no intention of doing human clinical trials of any 'cide. In that case you are admitting that NNVC is a scam,

OR

(2) That NNVC has in fact succeeded in testing some 'cide in humans. Do tell -- what were the results?

If you reject (1) and (2) then you must agree that NNVC has failed to test any 'cide in humans.

[Steady_T]

Don't know that I'd agree with you on that. The company said it would have tox tests and human tests done years ago and so far they haven't done what they said they would do.

True they haven't "made no such tests yet". The point of contention here is that the company said they would do those tests by now and they haven't done it.

So as I see it you have a choice to describe this discrepancy as either failure or lies.

Which is it?

I suppose it could be described as a 6 year oversight, but that seems stretching it a bit.