Flipper, Mapman, I have long believed that the expanded access trial was created to capture that evidence that DCVaxL is working well with recurring brain tumors. They already knew there was evidence it worked with rGBM because they had the 51 information arm, so why not gather that info in a trial? I don't know whether that expanded access trial meets the FDA regs for approval to use DCVaxL on rGBM, but if all the information they have on rGBM in the expanded trial plus the main trial's crossover arm plus the info arm point to efficacy for rGBM, I would think the FDA would think long and hard about denying this treatment to patients. Ever since they created that expanded access trial I've thought they may use it to push for approval for not only nGBM, but also rGBM.