LOL why don't we explain what we think they put up that was wrong. Please by all means show us what was wrong and I will gladly look over the financials and see what I come up with. But as far as I can see looks accurate to me. But thanks for putting the link up.
lol..."dubious source"? Every single number in that article is from PR's and quarterly reports. Recent developments???? You mean pinky "plans" for AS reductions and stock buybacks...cuz that is NEVER said on the OTC. lol
Oh, maybe you mean the "industry changing app". lol
How about the share burning stunt that we later found out eliminated just half the dilution that had occurred in the month preceding it?
Maybe we mean the 50:1 reverse split the CEO is doing on the shell company he spent 1/4 of a million dollars on while notes went unpaid.
Man, the "facts" used to support this CEO are shameless. lol
That's funny, because the linked article was actually rather kind. Here is one from the same source exposing more of the ridiculousness with this company. Clearly, the author wasn't interested in Schadel's share burning stunt that reduced the December dilution by just half, but we're talking the difference between 7.2 billion OS and 7.9 billion OS. lol
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
