Really? Why is it that every single share of ESCU stock has been accounted for in the audit, and there's no indication of any significant cash flow from the sale of shares? And no indication that Kimmons sold shares of his own? What you are speaking of simply did not happen.
If the company was selling shares Gary Kimmons was selling shares
Look no further than the multiple Reverse Splits for proof Ha Ha
Pink CEO's love to use that excuse oh no I aint selling cuz if I did u would see filings Ha Ha Meanwhile their share structure continue rising. .....and then yep u guessed it REVERSE SPLI
One of the silliest excuses the use
Do think the Market is that stupid?
How the hell did Gary not benefit? He was raking in Millions at the expense of shareholders