InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

TZOR

02/02/16 12:37 PM

#52383 RE: iclight #52378

I have had my questions deleted by AF or some editor at the street, so your point is?

You cannot refute my question earlier that superseded any of your feeble arguments.

Does Smith acknowledge that DCVax-L can fail?
Does AF acknowledge that DCVax-L can succeed?

A truly balanced approach would acknowledge both alternatives as possible outcomes because they are both possible, but AF will not, which is not balanced because it does not fit his narrative.
icon url

austinmediainc

02/02/16 1:52 PM

#52412 RE: iclight #52378

It doesn't matter what you say IC or RK, it will never be heard through unbiased ears. Your example of Smith's articles trumps that of AF's, yet he acts with no motive as per the blind here.

Even us 3 have been called shorts, yet I remember all of us drinking the koolaid at one point. We changed our views and because of that we are part of a short conspiracy that laid wait under the guise of a long only to pounce now.....gimmie a break!