Replies to post #172835 on Stella Diagnostics Inc (SLDX)

[Blofeld]

Here is an actual example from another company's PR announcing its signing of a contract.

**************************************
Due to business practices and considerations, neither the project, the name of the customer nor the terms of the contract will be disclosed
*************************************

Kent could've also just done something like this and be done with that. He was/is under no obligation to disclose each and every word of the contract to the public.

AFLAC, American Fidelity & Lucent, all 3 combined multi-billion dollar companies, receving money from TDEY just to provide TDEY the pleasure of using their names in HYPE PRs ...smh.

I was thinking to watch a comedy movie this weekend but now i am thinking that no amount of comedy will come close to what i've read on this board today.

[MoneyForNuthin]

The point...and the only point....in posting anything is to show proof that there is in fact an agreement, so that those who actually hold shares in TDEY may have reasonable assurance. Making the whole agreement public would be 1) stupid, and 2) wrongful - to the second party of the agreement (contract) and to shareholders who have a vested interest in keeping confidential information... confidential.

Anybody who has a clue what an agreement (contract) is would know that. Such contracts... agreements... are a) assets that should be protected from eyes of competition and kept confidential, and 2) private, between the two (or more) parties to the contract.

The point....and the only point....is that nobody knows what the agreement is without the whole agreement posted. The agreement has not been made public. Saying so is wrongful.

Anybody who has a clue what an agreement (contract) is would know that.

For all we know, TDEY is paying them for the pleasure of using their names on HYPE PR's.