I don't trust the intent of the article, believing it to be aimed at befriending readers so that they will become followers and thus position the author for a fatter paycheck. There are no proofs offered other than for innuendo---so I see no reason to buy into the premise.
On another subject, inflammatory, I read that last night Cramer declared that NTI is not a good choice du to its high yield.
Stupid, stupid, stupid! The guy is obviously brilliant yet he espouses theories not always founded in logic. He is looking at the distribution and overlooking capital appreciation. He is ignoring the possibility of the committee's rejecting WNR's proposal. He is not allowing that there might be a unit holders' revolt. There are so many possibilities here yet all he looks at is the yield.
Stupid!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
