One possibility is that DCVAX-L and DCVAX-Direct both get approved before the 90 day period, the stock price soars and no one really cares about the investigation results (other than perhaps when some of the hedge fund managers are arrested for stock manipulation).
Before you simply discount me as a pumper take a close look at the FDA guide lines on accelerated approval and tell me one can't see this being applied to Direct and perhaps even L too just from the Informational Arm results.
Guidance for Industry Expedited Programs for Serious Conditions – Drugs and Biologics
BREAKTHROUGH THERAPY DESIGNATION Section 506(a) of the FD&C Act provides for designation of a drug as a breakthrough therapy ". . . if the drug is intended, alone or in combination with 1 or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on 1 or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development."
Preliminary Clinical Evidence Unlike the information that could support fast track designation, which could include theoretical rationale, mechanistic rationale (based on nonclinical data), or evidence of nonclinical activity, breakthrough therapy designation requires preliminary clinical evidence of a treatment effect that may represent substantial improvement over available therapies for the treatment of a serious condition. For purposes of breakthrough therapy designation, preliminary clinical evidence means evidence that is sufficient to indicate that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement in effectiveness or safety over available therapies, but in most cases is not sufficient to establish safety and effectiveness for purposes of approval. FDA expects that such evidence generally would be derived from phase 1 or 2 trials. Nonclinical information could support the clinical evidence of drug activity. In all cases, preliminary clinical evidence demonstrating that the drug may represent a substantial improvement over available therapy should involve a sufficient number of patients to be considered credible. However, FDA recognizes that the data cannot be expected to be definitive at the time of designation.
Wouldn't you agree that the fear of this happening is much more plausible in explaining why we have seen such aggressive attacks of the company and manipulation of the stock. They are big time frightened of this happening and LP/NWBO completely alterating the playing field for fighting cancer with an extremely safe, but much harder to deliver personalized therapies. Big Pharma business model is for volume manufacturing of a single pill used for everyone.
Isn't this why all us longs invested to begin with. DCVAX is a game changer and of significant benefit for patients with really no other viable treatment options. It is really unheard of that the FDA would let NWBO used Direct with any type of solid inoperable tumor. They already recognize the potential.