I retired from an Investor Relations career about five years ago. Things have changed rapidly, I now see. It would have been unthinkable "in the day" --lol--to assume a FB or Twitter sort of nonsense would satisfy the SEC as many will not trust the veracity of such postings. I do not use Twitter or FB, I'm not into drama nor do I give a crap about the drama of others. I view GC as using a public mecca of sorts while he may not, in fact, believe in anything other than his own replenishment. Because I don't rely upon such devices, I don't know what GC is saying unless he files something with the SEC. Edgar should be my middle name.
Gimme dem ol' time (SEC" filin's, gimme dem ol'....la de dah....
By the way, I appreciate your asking for elucidation. You are clearly one of the most straightforward posters we have, not yielding to the usual circle-victimization party in evidence.
Thank you.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
