InvestorsHub Logo

exwannabe

11/25/15 10:45 PM

#243752 RE: nuke661 #243751

My bad.

The 17 months was in the high the PD-L1 group. Have no clue why I got this one so wrong. I will blame it on drinking too much of 'loofs corn liquor when reading the initial results. :-)

But still 12.2 vs 9.4 overall. So the concept is the same that it could push final data out. Though admittedly a minor effect and barely worth noting.

BTW: Not to be overly critical since you were correct in correcting me. But the 17 was not within the responder group. It was in the PD-L1 positive group. It is nearly meaningless to report survival by response group.