InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 90
Posts 17313
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2006

Re: nuke661 post# 243751

Wednesday, 11/25/2015 10:45:06 PM

Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:45:06 PM

Post# of 345868
My bad.

The 17 months was in the high the PD-L1 group. Have no clue why I got this one so wrong. I will blame it on drinking too much of 'loofs corn liquor when reading the initial results. smile

But still 12.2 vs 9.4 overall. So the concept is the same that it could push final data out. Though admittedly a minor effect and barely worth noting.

BTW: Not to be overly critical since you were correct in correcting me. But the 17 was not within the responder group. It was in the PD-L1 positive group. It is nearly meaningless to report survival by response group.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News