IMHO it could be the case against AT&T. Again imho once this one is resolved the case against some former Wamu employees will also be resolved. If I recall it had something to do with JPMC.
Objections/Responses Received: A. AT&T Corp.’s Opposition to Debtors’ Objection to Proof of Claim Filed by AT&T Corp. (Claim No. 3725) [Docket No. 5268; filed 8/11/10] B. Declaration of Kari La Fleur in Support of Debtors’ Objection to Proof of Claim Filed by AT&T Corp. (Claim No. 3725) [Docket No. 5269; filed 8/11/10] Related Documents: i. Order Directing the Docketing Clerk to Remove Exhibits A and B to the Debtors’ Objection to Proof of Claim Filed by AT&T Corp. (Claim No. 3725) from the Docket [Docket No. 3738; filed 5/14/10] ii. AT&T’s Motion for Relief Under Confidentiality Order and Related Relief [Docket No. 4345; filed 5/26/10] Case 08-12229-MFW Doc 12137 Filed 11/20/15 Page 2 of 37 3 RLF1 13243850v.1 iii. Order to Shorten Time and Limit Notice of AT&T’s Motion for Relief Under Confidentiality Order and Related Relief [Docket No. 4351; filed 5/27/10] iv. Order to Shorten Time and Limit Notice of AT&T’s Motion for an Order Authorizing AT&T to File Under Seal a Motion for Relief Under Confidentiality Order and Related Relief [Docket No. 4352; filed 5/27/10] v. Notice of Hearing Regarding AT&T’s Motion for Relief Under Confidentiality Order and Related Relief [Docket No. 4385; filed 5/27/10] vi. Notice of Hearing Regarding AT&T’s Motion for an Order Authorizing AT&T to File Under Seal a Motion or Relief Under Confidentiality for Order and Related Relief [Docket No. 4390; filed 5/27/10] vii. Order Approving AT&T’s Motion for Relief Under Confidentiality Order and Related Relief [Docket No. 4416; filed 5/28/10] viii. Order Authorizing AT&T to File Under Seal a Motion for Relief Under Confidentiality Order and Related Relief [Docket No. 4417; filed 5/28/10] ix. Notice of Submission of Copy of Proof of Claim Relating to Debtors’ Objection to Proof of Claim Filed by AT&T Corp. (Claim No. 3725) [Docket No. 4620; filed 6/4/10]