Replies to post #38491 on Sigma Labs Inc (SASI)

[Profit]

I would love to answerer your post with another great post but I would only be facilitating my own misfortune I will save it for next week

[Long-vestor]

If it's not dumping share, which is possible, share in lue of cash is common for services rendered and as it's potentially, also Dave's new company. Not exactly a sight for sore eyes, Dave breaks out @.40 cents looking for funding, and as this company did the same, the reflection; years and years of promises, beating down the price with dilution and hardly much to show for it except swapped out 'consultant income' Income they would have otherwise, gained independently, 'consulting'.

They may be on the verge of licensing here, yet, been saying it for 5 years now. Now that Dave has opened the door with other prospects, ya gotta wonder just what's going on here, as Dave seems to have realized,, cash for share makes excellent income no matter what you're doing.

So, maybe share for services, and not really a good time for Dave to try funding another.

[alanthill]

Driftin:

You contimue to be one of the more realistic of the SGLB fan club. I agree with your post except for your conviction that SGLB is certain to succeed in the long run. To me the jury is clearly still out on this point. It seems clear that GE is going to start full scale production of the nozzles with minimal, if any, use of SGLB's technology. Most here said that was an impossibility just a few months ago. All of the pilots, joint ventures, etc. are basically test beds have been their products. The longer time goes on without a major player signing up to a significant order the greater the risk that the solutions are not nearly as fool-proof as Mark would have us believe. Your projections about the future may be right-on-the-money, but it is far from a sure thing.