InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Rcranga

11/07/15 4:39 PM

#24864 RE: Pennies_Envy #24863

I DOUBT THEY WILL GIVE INVESTORS ANY WARNING PRIOR TO A R/S GIVEN THEIR 7 MONTH LATE HISTORY WITH THE 10K. I DONT THINK IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT SELLING 10 MILLION AT 0.0001 IS MUCH BETTER THAN BEING LEFT WITH 10 THOUSAND OR LESS POST SPLIT AND A FALLING PPS.
icon url

PennyStockTrader2

11/07/15 6:27 PM

#24865 RE: Pennies_Envy #24863

MISNJEF, I very very strongly disagree with your statement about a Reverse Split. Do a search through XCLK posts for the last year and a half and you'll find plenty of predictions about that. I can tell you authoritatively that that is NOT in the plan of management. For starters, why would they possibly do it, what benefit does it suit anyone? Eventually yes, if the company is successful there is a good chance for that to happen, I have discussed that with them, but now, not a chance in the world. They would probably just go out of business before doing a Reverse Split. If you have evidence otherwise, then provide it.