InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JB3729

11/05/15 7:22 PM

#30914 RE: Jockimo #30911

Too much pre-presentation info. Just like the original presentation title.
icon url

shoeman6

11/05/15 7:23 PM

#30915 RE: Jockimo #30911

"They are presenting Full Part A data at the Conf and only prelim Part B. The abstract including info re: Part B would not be proper, thus the change."
icon url

shoeman6

11/05/15 7:26 PM

#30918 RE: Jockimo #30911

Also, the sentence was incorrect in context. Read:
"The primary outcome of the study is safety, and ANAVEX 2-73
was well tolerated. In the secondary outcome endpoints preliminary
analysis of data from subjects to date shows an average improvement
of the MMSE score at week 12 in PART B (week 17 from baseline). "


They go from talking about Part A to Part B and confuse the two in the first abstract. A decision was made to stick to the context of Part A. The old sentence made it seem like the secondary outcome endpoints of Part A were being justified by results of the Part B study. See how that would be confusing or even incorrect?