InvestorsHub Logo

blu_1

10/25/15 6:20 PM

#26340 RE: stealthways #26336

I don't comprehend this line of reasoning. If what you say is correct, why'd the study even bother to record amplitudes? And, if a positive change in amplitude does show improvement in cognition in patients with alzheimer's, as Anavex contends, why didn't they use the more reliable ERP measure, which is latency?

circa1762

10/25/15 7:16 PM

#26346 RE: stealthways #26336

I don't think the latency arguments are a fabrication, but I do think that the new Neuronetrix study makes them look outdated. In the Neuronetrix study, numerous measures of both amplitude and latency achieve statistical significance in discerning between healthy control and mild AD.