PITA'S POST --> "My long study of OTC start-up businesses has provided me with the opinion that the vast majority of the CEO's are not really into growing an acorn into a giant oak of a company.
They have a hidden agenda (business plan) to issue, swap, trade, and ultimately sell stock. They are penny stock traders on steroids.
In the case this CEO, he has yet to realize much money on mcig and vtcq because he hasn't yet had a good opportunity to dump shares, but I think he is patient. Any spinoff is always good for him as it complicates the matter, which makes it increasingly for the folks to keep track of what is going on.
Paul knows his way, but not the seasoned manipulator like Perlowin, etc...
"If you first don't succeed, try, try again.""
Opinions are just that, they are not claims as fact. I think, and you may disagree for your own reasons, that it is good when people are clear about opinions, but not all do.
So I have to ask, why do you ask this person to provide "evidence" of their opinion? Did you think this was other than opinion??
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
