First, I said 300m shares, not 500m. Would be nice to respond with an accurate depiction of my post. Secondly, and again, if REDUCE-IT, as you all claim, is an absolute SHOE-IN, and hundreds of millions in revenues in a few years is a virtual guarantee, as again, many of you do actually claim, then why, why in the WORLD is this at $2 a share? Why? Any reasoning? Outside of "it is a conspiracy to hold the price down"? If things were as simple and straightforward as you claim, this certainly would be nowhere near $2 a share.
You can't reconcile the pie in the sky long mentality being truthful with a $2 stock price. Something has to give between the two.