InvestorsHub Logo

rockie101

10/18/15 4:36 PM

#438881 RE: AZCowboy #438879

Isn't there lots of ifs and doubts in that last paragraph?

bkshadow

10/18/15 5:32 PM

#438887 RE: AZCowboy #438879

The R-203 attachment was only in 2014???

???really?

???so the assertion is that, in this 2014 important time period, this R-203 attachment was part of some new revelation that was a secret withheld until then???

???really?

!!!besides that assertion, which no one can seriously take seriously, is that that attachment is about repurchase obligations of mortgage backed securities that are being serviced by JPM as per their purchase of WMB (including the servicing rights).

%%%nothing to do with WMI at all; not off-balance (sans the assertion) or even WMB or FDIC-R.

(((at least not in facts and realities.

###never mind illiquid assets or non-monetized assets (neither of which exist).

^^^and the same for 'shares for value (seriously, how does it compute that WMIH will issues shares to escrow markers (shares???) outside of being LTI's???

&&&because LTI's are now to "difficult" to administer???

...really, some believe this???

@@@must be that WMIIC, the co-debtor, that held these illiquid, non-monetized, off-balance sheet, ready for 'shares for value of the newly discovered in 2014 of the Deutsche Bank Trust MBS disclosure by JPM of no repurchase obligations via R-203???