Replies to post #10869 on NanoTech Gaming Inc (NTGL)

[legolambazoid]

Well said Gary, my thoughts exactly. The general overall sour tone of this posters rhetoric would in any case have given away his agenda and rendered his "opinions" impotent to all but the most inexperienced investor.

I do feel however given the rudimentary nature of the form 15c2-11 that somewhat of a better effort could have been made to at least fill in the blanks with something of substance, so that perhaps the entire thing didn't give such an "offhand" feel...the figures seem a bit arbitrary at best, apparently much more is going on than meets the eye. If nothing else, a contrarian view suggests that based on empirical data, silence is golden, while a wealth of PR's usually mean that the stock printing press is running 24/7. Just IMO of course.
Regards, Lego

[abcsofhealth]

Granted the report was UNAUDITED BUT that indicates as any CEO would disclose, the BEST. Removing ANY associated costs as a function of purchases for equipment etc; still leaves this GARAGE operation in the red. The wage RANGE I indicated shows this for what it is; a sweat shop at best with a great RENT source for FH. NOTE: My wage range did not even enclude the UPSCALE wages as a function of management. I dare ANY body to show a NUMBERS BASED analysis off the report that PROVES profitability justifying 5.3bil OS. This is nothing more than a BET or ROLL of the dice. Money can be made IF IRRATIONAL EXHUBERANCE kicks in due to a wonderfull BS PR. Based on the reported numbers this thing isn't going ANYWHERE.
This company was HYPED at ~10 times the so-called earnings and even with that was marginable at best.
Just my opinion!
Have a nice day!
abcs