Is it a typo when it says that "FDA suggested that positive outcome in RI could lead to the formal approval of the ANCHOR indication?" - Shouldn't it be REDUCE-IT indication, not ANCHOR indication?
Thanks Sam for the report. A few nuggets from the report:
1) AMRN commented that they were considering strategies to facilitate patient access when payors pushback on covering Vascepa.
2) the company remains confident Vascepa will show a positive effect on cardiovascular outcomes by the time the trial has accrued all events needed for the final analysis in 2017,
3) believe that partnerships for Vascepa in a contingent of international countries could be non-dilutive sources of cash.