Replies to post #45758 on Trans-Pacific Aerospace Company Inc. (fka TPAC)

[waterchaser]

I found this part interesting as the representations here have been different.

The conditional qualification approval applies to the above mentioned parts. It is a conditional qualification approval until such time as the Qualifying Activity is able to inspect the factory at Guangzhou, China

[Stanner]

TPAC-AWESOME_!$$$!_TPAC IS AWESOME_!$$$!_-TY rnb'

[Peggy]

So he got certified over 2 years ago and still hasn't sold squat? What's the story with that?

[Alaskindream]

There are hoops and bounds to certifying anything for the military, however, it becomes easier to maintain certification cause it has been establish as to what is needed. This article clearly states that qualification must be submitted bi-yearly or be removed the from list. Why would anyone go to all that trouble to let it lapse and restart the long tedious process again? Tpac is still on the QPL as of 10/2015.

............Including a product on the QPL does not relieve the manufacturer of its contractual obligation to deliver items meeting all the specification requirements . To retain QPL status, your company must comply with the retention of qualification requirements stated in the applicable standard and submit on a bi-yearly basis a completed certification form DD1718. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in the withdrawal of your company.

[Helter Skelter]

Can't seem to find this fellow...

Our point of contact is Mr. George Stolt, Code 4.3.5.4 [phone] , who may be contacted at the address below:

AIR VEHICLE SUBSYSTEMS DIVISION
ATTN GEORGE STOLT CODE 4 3 5 4 BLDG 2187
NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND
48110 SHAW ROAD STE 3320A
PATUXENT RIVER MD 20670-1906

One hit? tpac? What do you all make of this? Even googling the phone number << O >> "fails"...???