InvestorsHub Logo

rafunrafun

10/01/15 7:43 AM

#60231 RE: jessellivermore #60229

Thanks... see the EDIT in the previous message (the one you replied to)

Sam81

10/01/15 8:51 AM

#60237 RE: jessellivermore #60229

JL, Raf & BB

Reading the FDA Law Blog, it clearly mention the below:
"Under that regulation—the validity of which Eisai does not challenge—the exclusivity period for a new drug begins when the FDA issues its letter approving the drug, even if the drug’s manufacturer must await DEA’s scheduling determination before it can bring the drug to market. The regulation does provide for an exception under limited circumstances. But the FDA has interpreted that exception narrowly, and the Court is bound to defer to the agency’s reasonable interpretation of its own regulation."

The regulation does provide for an exception under limited circumstances----could it be the case for AMRN, an exception which will make up the lost period of no decision and later NME decision...just a thought, what do you think guys?

BioChica

10/01/15 10:18 AM

#60244 RE: jessellivermore #60229

7-1/2 years really, Don't forget the carrot at the end of NCE! Which applies to our patents in O.B.!

30-month stay does not begin to run until the NCE exclusivity expiration.

Biobillionair

10/01/15 10:36 AM

#60247 RE: jessellivermore #60229