Why would TDCP not have legal recourse for their IP? Where does it say that Hakki owns the IP he was paid by TDCP to develop? It sure seems like the investors are being taken advantage of.
Also, claims that Hakki invented cspace does not mesh with Sluss as the PI of the SRA and also listed on the old corporate announcements. There are others on the patents. There is the date separating the OU IP from the TDCP IP.
How can there be development of the next generation when they have yet to get the current generation to be a viable product?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
