InvestorsHub Logo

Mr Pennypacker

09/18/15 1:29 AM

#35841 RE: shajandr #35823

Wrong. It's really simple:
COR's clients want to be made whole by Carter /CRGP. If COR's clients won the case, and there was fraud, they could not go after CRGP shareholder dividends. They would go after the defendants (shareholders NOT included). Wanna know why? Well FINRA is NOT investigating the dividend. They did not find any problems with it. As far as CRGP divi holders are concerned, case closed.

Simply put. Finra let shareholders off the hook. This litigation puts carter in the spotlight.


Russ1725

09/18/15 9:56 AM

#35862 RE: shajandr #35823

The complaint is very specifically tailored to COR and COR's client who converted debt to equity. Plaintiffs are not alleging that they need to be made whole by seeking recourse from all of the shareholders who received the dividend. They specifically want to be made whole regarding the dividend that CRGP itself received from their buy-back of shares. I'm not saying it's impossible to get the dividend taken back from us individual shareholders but it's not going to happen based on this pending litigation.