InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

blauboad

07/04/03 5:58 PM

#8028 RE: Jerry R #8026


If AMD wants to launch a successful product, then it has the obligation to create all of the infrastructure necessary to make it a success. It was unwise to depend upon so many outside vendors to do so much of the heavy lifting for Opteron (i.e. chipsets, motherboards, compilers, software content, etc.) that it puts the probablity of success in jeopardy.


Without third party support AMD is dead. Designing its own chipsets, mobos, etc. would alienate the third parties that AMD depends on and divert much needed resources. This is one of those disadvantages that can turn out to be an advantage in the long run, as AMD does not have the option of making the mistake Intel is making by trying to become more proprietary and in-house. Of course, if key parties leave or produce bad products, the strategy could drive them into bankruptcy too. But they don't really have any other choice, do they?
icon url

wbmw

07/04/03 6:46 PM

#8032 RE: Jerry R #8026

Jerry, Re: If AMD wants to launch a successful product, then it has the obligation to create all of the infrastructure necessary to make it a success. It was unwise to depend upon so many outside vendors to do so much of the heavy lifting for Opteron (i.e. chipsets, motherboards, compilers, software content, etc.) that it puts the probablity of success in jeopardy.

Creating a new architecture does not come for free, and a "build it and they will come" attitude won't work to make AMD64 a success.


How can a company the size of AMD create the infrastructure necessary to ramp a new platform in a market they've never been successful in? The question is rhetorical, because the problem is that AMD's business acumen still involves going head to head with Intel, and as such, they are asking the industry to hold them to the same standards. This creates a paradox, since a company the size of AMD cannot be held to Intel's standards, simply because they don't have the resources to do what Intel does. The problem with AMD lies in its very fundamental business principles.